Pretreatment of infant formula with sodium polystyrene sulfonate : focus on optimal amount and contact time.

BACKGROUND: In pediatric patients at risk of hyperkalemia there are limited treatment or preventive alternatives for this electrolyte imbalance. Oral or rectal sodium polystyrene sulfonate (SPS) has several potential adverse effects, and dietary potassium restriction may compromise nutrition. Pretreatment of infant formula with SPS has been previously studied with promising efficacy. The optimal dosing and contact time has not been fully elucidated for this practice, nor have brand and generic products been compared. OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of varying amounts of brand and generic SPS for the removal of potassium from formula after 1 and 24 hours. METHODS: SPS was added to infant formula in four different amounts measured in milliliters to reflect how a parent or caregiver would measure this product at home. After 1 and 24 hours samples were withdrawn and potassium and sodium levels were measured. RESULTS: Potassium decreased in all samples, with the greatest reduction after the addition of 10 mL of SPS. Sodium levels increased in all pretreated samples to a greater extent than the potassium reduction. Contact time of either 1 or 24 hours did not impact the amount of potassium removed or the increase in sodium concentration. There were also no differences found between generic and brand SPS products. CONCLUSION: The effectiveness of SPS for formula pretreatment appears to have a plateau effect beyond the addition of 20 mL (16.47 g of brand name product, 19.5 g of generic product). This study demonstrates an effective protocol for pretreatment of formula.

Clinical recovery of chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction with cisapride in a complex pediatric patient.

Cisapride is a gastrointestinal prokinetic that facilitates or restores motility along the entire gastrointestinal tract. It has been used successfully to treat acute and chronic intestinal pseudo-obstructions (CIPs) in adults, but there is a paucity of literature surrounding the treatment of CIP in pediatric patients and therapies for CIP are limited and their impact is often unsatisfactory. This case report presents the use of cisapride in the management of pseudo-obstruction. Treatment with cisapride substantially improved the patient's symptoms and improved feeding tolerance. It improved his prognosis remarkably and prevented the need for end-of-life care. He experienced no adverse effects throughout the course of therapy. The treatment regimen is discussed in this case report.

Is statin-associated cognitive impairment clinically relevant? A narrative review and clinical recommendations.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the impact of statin use on cognition. DATA SOURCES: A literature search was performed using MEDLINE (1950-November 2011), EMBASE (1980-November 2011), and the Cochrane Library (1960-November 2011) using the search terms "cognition/drug effects," "delirium, dementia, amnestic, cognitive disorders/chemically induced," "memory disorders/chemically induced," "hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitors/adverse effects," and "hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitors." A bibliographic search on included references was also conducted. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Studies were included for analysis if they were conducted in humans and examined the impact of statin use on cognition as either a primary or secondary endpoint; case reports and case series were also included for analysis. DATA SYNTHESIS: Reports of statin-associated cognitive impairment were found primarily in observational studies (eg, case reports/series). One randomized controlled trial demonstrated that simvastatin impaired some measures of cognition compared to placebo. Conversely, in the majority of randomized controlled trials and observational studies, statins were found to have either a neutral or beneficial effect on cognition. Preliminary data suggest that statins that are less lipophilic (ie, pravastatin and rosuvastatin) may be less likely to contribute to cognitive impairment due to limited penetration across the blood-brain barrier. These drugs would be a logical alternative in cases where cognitive impairment secondary to another statin is suspected. CONCLUSIONS: Despite several reports of statin-associated cognitive impairment, this adverse effect remains a rare occurrence among the totality of the literature. If statin-associated cognitive impairment is suspected, a trial discontinuation can reveal a temporal relationship. Switching from lipophilic to hydrophilic statins may resolve cognitive impairment. The vascular benefits and putative cognitive benefits outweigh the risk of cognitive impairment associated with statin use; therefore, the current evidence does not support changing practice with respect to statin use, given this adverse effect.